Talk:Omak School District/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: PrairieKid (talk · contribs) 04:57, 5 April 2013 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

I am going to have to quickfail this nomination. For the subject, the article has more information than I would ever have thought to be out there. Omak School District is on the Wikimap- however, with the prose in the shape it is, the images and the references being how they are, I just can't see it getting to that GA level. It just isn't a big enough subject.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * A lot of run-on sentences, some spelling errors... really does not flow very well.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * The article cites the school district's website, The Spokes-Review about 30% of the time, The Wenatchee World about 20% of the time, The Nat. Cent. For. Edu. Stats. another 30% of the time, and even cites the Yellow Pages. (Which I have never seen before.
 * The sources are all reliable though, so I do not see that as a concern.  TB randley  22:23, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * That checks out.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * The article really does need some images.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Does not meet criteria. PrairieKid (talk) 04:57, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Does not meet criteria. PrairieKid (talk) 04:57, 5 April 2013 (UTC)