Talk:Omarolluk

Omarolluks are not Manmade Artifacts
In revisions as 02:32, 15 December 2011, I removed the link to and figure of cupstones and links to lithic technology and prehistoric technology because, as is well documented in the scientific literature and on popular web sites, omarolluks are not prehistoric artifacts. Although they might look like cupstones, omarolluks are natural rock formations that are completely unrelated to any cupstones, prehistoric artifacts or any other manmade artifacts. Associating omarolluks with cupstones only needlessly confuses people with a meaningless and unscientific comparison of natural stone features with manmade artifacts. Paul H. (talk) 02:47, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The change is well-intended, but the article is a lot more useful *with* that information than without -- the idea is, people can find out the distinction between two similar-looking classes of objects.184.155.85.14 (talk) 04:05, 11 March 2014 (UTC)