Talk:OmniScriptum/Archives/2015

Absurd ref
I replaced the following ref

found in, with cn bcz it entails either a clerical error or a claim to have the use of a time machine. IMO my undertaking to replace it would be counterproductive, bcz until the rest of the massively footnoted aarticle has been similarly inspected, there is every reason to presume that any (or all) of them may also be absurd on their respective faces. --Jerzy•t 05:43, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't understand your reasoning or explanation, there is no contradiction of facts or dates. The reference is a German newspaper published in 2010, and it supports the statement. I am restoring this. Fences  &amp;  Windows  21:38, 10 August 2015 (UTC)