Talk:OmniVis

Quality of sources
I included a number of lower quality sources in this (blogs, primary sources) to get some details. I've considered NPR and WSJ as the high quality sources to establish notability. CT55555 (talk) 18:35, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Since this comment, I've reduced the content and relied more on the higher quality sources. CT55555 (talk) 00:06, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

If anyone need a copy of the WSJ article words, I can share. It's behind a paywall and I did review it before citing.

Due to lack of notability around their PPE work, I've removed reference to this and kept the page focussed on what is notable, their diagnostic tests CT55555 (talk) 00:05, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

On notability
These guys invented a system that detects cholera in water in 30 minutes. Existing systems take about a week. I recognise to the lay reader this is not apparently notable, but to epidemiologists this is an exceptional big deal. CT55555 (talk) 00:02, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

On neutral voice
I received feedback that an early draft of this seemed promotional. I've made adjustments accordingly and removed the awards section and the reference to staff who are not the CEO/inventor. CT55555 (talk) 00:05, 3 November 2021 (UTC)