Talk:On-again, off-again relationship

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedy deleted as lacking sufficient context to identify its subject, because... I'm still editing it. Come back in an hour! --Jimthing (talk) 03:26, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree. I am surprised this page was not on here. Keep working on it, find sources. I will help. Tinton5 (talk) 04:23, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Added some further info. Can't find many citations to link for for this though, for obvious reasons, such a term —while obvious to most in everyday conversational understanding— is not exactly defined. Hence associated terms I have added as redirects to this page. --Jimthing (talk) 04:56, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Very well done. The page itself is describing the term, so adding 50 sources is not necessary. For the size of it, the amount of sources is sufficient and covers most of the material given. There is still future opportunity to expand, which is what the stub is for. If you think this page cannot be expanded any more, then you have the option to remove the stub tag, since you are the creator of the page. Tinton5 (talk) 05:01, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

This whole article is ridiculous and has no place in the intertube encyclopedia of record. Suggest it be removed as lacking sufficient meaning for existence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.58.65.223 (talk) 04:38, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

After seven years — as in SEVEN FREAKIN YEARS — this "article" has failed to deserve Stub status. It's nothing more than a dictionary entry with a couple of footnotes and some trivia. Delete. Weeb Dingle (talk) 16:28, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
 * That's not really accurate. It's a reasonable stub.— Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 23:50, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Social Attraction and Relationship Development
— Assignment last updated by Kdoming5 (talk) 14:47, 13 April 2023 (UTC)