Talk:Oncomodulin 2

Proposed merge with Oncomodulin
Identical (sort of) הסרפד  (call me Hasirpad) 19:50, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Oncomodulin should be the title of the article. LOC4951 should be a section within it. Gene regulation of LOC4951 can be discussed within that article as new research establishes genetic modulators: currently there is discrepancy and differences in genetic properties between rats, mice, and plants (not to mention humans). The article LOC4951, as it is written, seems to suggest that Calmodulin regulates itself, which I have not found evidence of in a quick review of some of the literature. I have added relevant information to the Oncomodulin article, as I don't know the best way to merge the two - but I agree that they can become one article. Thenerdypengwin (talk) 23:03, 3 April 2016 (UTC) TheNerdyPengwin
 * Support merge, and that Oncomodulin should be the title. Most of the current LOC4951 discusses the protein rather than the gene, and the function of the protein rather than the stretch of DNA, seems more notable. Klbrain (talk) 16:50, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Oppose: looking at this again, see that Oncomodulin and Oncomodulin2 are two different proteins, and so argue that they shouldn't be merged. I should have read Hasirpad's comment more thoughtfully! The text of the article also needs changing throughout, as these proteins are not the same. Klbrain (talk) 09:06, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Gene identity
See gene databases: OCM and OCM2 are not identical. הסרפד (call me Hasirpad) 19:55, 15 June 2015 (UTC)