Talk:One Day International

Untitled
Might be worth mentioning that some of the early ODIs (eg NZ v Eng 1974/75) were played as 35 8-ball overs. Loganberry (Talk) 01:29, 7 August 2005 (UTC)

Rules - ties
What's up with this text:

"If the number of runs scored by both teams are equal when the second team loses all of its wickets or exhausts all its overs, it shall get decided by Which team lost fewer wickets to reach the score, if no result, the team with the higher run rate at the start of the innings shall win, if still no result, the match then goes into a bowl off."

Every ODI I've seen, when both teams score the same runs, it's a tie. I've heard of the number of wickets being used to determine a winner (never seen it though); both teams would have a run rate of 0 at the start of the innings; and what on earth is a "bowl off"? BlueXR6Turbo


 * This info was only recently added to the article (diff). It contradicts the ODI laws on the ICC website, which state:"Law 21.3.1 If the scores are equal, the result shall be a tie and no account shall be taken of the number of wickets which have fallen."
 * I've reverted to the previous (accurate) wording. As for the "bowl off", I can only guess the editor was referring to a bowl-out. --Muchness 12:58, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

a bowl off is similar the equivalent to a penalty shoot-out in football, each team chooses 5 bowlers to bowl at the stumps (no batsman) and who ever hits most wins. If it is a tie after 5 it goes to sudden death (this actually happened in a twenty20 last year)

ball change
How about mentioning the ball change in the 35th over rule. Is this a rule? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.234.170.40 (talk) 06:28, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Move
This should be moved to 'One-day International' or 'One-Day International' if the rules of English are to be followed. Or simply 'ODI', if common usage is preferred ('odi' redirects here). I notice the direction to the women's version at the top has it correct - but it turns out to be a redirect! Rothorpe (talk) 16:18, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

fielding restrictions
The article is wrong. Fielding restrictions were not introduced in 1992. All the reference says is they were changed in 1992.

From memory: there was a game in which all English fielders, including the wicket keeper, fielded on the boundary during the last over. I think that was 1979-80, meaning the restrictions were introduced, in Australia at least, in 1980-81. There were certainly restrictions in 1980-81 because Australia had one too many fielders outside the circle during the infamous Underarm bowling incident of 1981. Adpete (talk) 06:03, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

NCL Ranking
Basin acharya Babin Acharya1 (talk) 08:53, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

India 1 Anilsjadhav (talk) 12:04, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on One Day International. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090809143624/http://thehub.natwest.com/Cricket/Default.aspx to http://thehub.natwest.com/Cricket/Default.aspx
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060323081414/http://www.icc-cricket.com/icc-iccss/content/story/211848.html to http://www.icc-cricket.com/icc-iccss/content/story/211848.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060323081406/http://www.icc-cricket.com/southafrica/content/story/212296.html to http://www.icc-cricket.com/southafrica/content/story/212296.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:51, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Formatting for Temporary Status List
As a result of current qualifier tournament, list of teams with temporary status is complex, can we make table for that? For Ex:

H1007 (talk) 07:39, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, table makes more sense than an unformatted list. I'd add in a column or 2 to detail how / why the team gained / lost the status, even if this is just the name of the tournament where this happened. Spike &#39;em (talk) 12:58, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I'd remove the rank column and the contents of Notes could be merged with the other columns I mentioned. Spike &#39;em (talk) 13:00, 20 March 2018 (UTC)


 * My attempt:

So far, eight teams have held this temporary ODI status before either being promoted to Test status or relegated after failing to finish high enough at the World Cup Qualifier. This list includes Netherlands, who have subsequently regained ODI status:
 * Spike &#39;em (talk) 17:48, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

This looks good. In former team list, Relegation reason can be added like Qualification reason. H1007 (talk) 04:50, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I'll add a bit more info to the Status until column. Any ideas on better column headings gratefully received, as I'm not sure mine are the best. Spike &#39;em (talk) 11:23, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Maybe this is just a failure to update the numbers, but the Temporary ODI status section says that "the following four teams currently have this status", then lists six countries. It then says that so far eight teams have held this status before being promoted or demoted, but it lists seven. Not sure what is going on here, but something doesn't add up.50.37.125.12 (talk) 05:10, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Zimbabwe-Permanent ODI Status
How is starting date of Zimbabwe's permanent ODI status as 1-Feb-1992. They got Permanent Status in 1992. They made their test debut against India in 1992. They also played a ODI in that series on 25-Oct-1992. Should this not be the staring date? Shubham389 (talk) 11:55, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Why NatWest Series in this Article
Why only NatWest Series in this Article? Sherifkk (talk) 06:34, 15 September 2023 (UTC)


 * I understand that its merged here from a deleted Article, But it looks irrelevant Here. Nominating to Delete this section from here. Sherifkk (talk) 06:37, 15 September 2023 (UTC)