Talk:One Meridian Plaza/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * No dead links per Link checker
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * On hold
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * On hold
 * On hold


 * Prose
 * In the years after the fire One Meridian Plaza sat vacant and burned across the street from Philadelphia City Hall in the middle of the city. -- burned across the street? what does this mean?
 * One Meridian Plaza is the sixth tallest destroyed building in the world. -- took me twice to read this properly. Consider using the third tallest at time of demolition to avoid the article becoming dated.
 *  At the time of construction, sprinklers were only built on the service levels below ground.  -- fixed.
 *  the helicopter spotted a broken window on the 28th floor located in an area that couldn't  -- couldn't -> could not -- fixed.

Outside of the two minor items needing clarification/comment above, this article meets the good article criteria. If you have any questions or concerns about this review, let me know. I will be watching this page, so if you have any comments this is the best place to communicate. Thanks, -Mitico (talk, contribs) 18:35, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Overall


 * Thank you for the review. I fixed the two items you pointed out. Medvedenko (talk) 23:04, 19 February 2009 (UTC)


 * After re-reading the article I believe this article meets all the criteria of a good article. Great work Medvedenko! Any questions, let me know. -Mitico (talk, contribs) 14:57, 20 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I suggest that the sculpture Triune, by Robert Engman be mentioned in the article. This sculpture was placed there in 1975, and is still there, and has a placque on the south side saying
 * “Triune by Robert M. Engman Dedicated to the people of our community. Girard Bank and The Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance Company March 26, 1975”


 * Here is a picture of it: http://www.philart.net/images/large/triune.jpg


 * As you may know, the city requires 1% to be spent on public art for buildings constructed in the city. --DThomsen8 (talk) 23:53, 16 April 2009 (UTC)