Talk:Oneness Pentecostalism/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Whiteguru (talk · contribs) 11:26, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

'''Starts GA Review. The review will follow the same sections of the Article. ''' --Whiteguru (talk) 11:26, 29 September 2021 (UTC)



Observations
HTML document size: 305 kB   Prose size (including all HTML code): 52 kB    References (including all HTML code): 148 kB    Wiki text: 80 kB    Prose size (text only): 32 kB (5233 words) "readable prose size" References (text only): 21 kB


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Are there too many links in the Lede? See MOS:LEAD


 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * Reliable sources used.


 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * The link the lede to Modalistic Monarchianism is both important and informative.
 * The link to church history is not informative
 * The section 'Background of Oneness theology' holds together really well. It is clear and not confusing in its exposition.
 * Oneness views on the early church → consider the clarity of this section and the utility of citing Tertullian directly.


 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Remarkably, given attempts to put personal points view into this article, stringent page watchers have been able to preserve neutral point of view for this article.


 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Page created 27 July 2003
 * Page has 153 watchers of whom 15 are page watchers who visited recent edits.
 * Page has 2,954 edits by 859 editors
 * Page has 18 generic rollbacks...
 * 90 day page views = 30,012 with a daily average of 330 page reads.
 * 46 reverts for the first 500 edits. Some reverts are edit warring over doctrine and theology.
 * 34 reverts for the next 500 edits.
 * Another 14 reverts from page creation.
 * That's 94 reverts. Most reverts are over doctrine. Citations. Church History. Keeping Praise the Lord out of the article.


 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Page has one image: Basic Latin cross; fair use rationale is present.


 * 1) Overall:
 * Good work in presenting Oneness baptism, Oneness theology. A strong preservation of the doctrinal presentation of this form of Pentecostalism is given.