Talk:Onesies (brand)

POV
This article is incredibly POV. It reads like a defense of Gerber's right to the patented name "Onesie" instead of an overview of a brand of jumpsuits. A good example of what to follow would be our Kleenex article. Brand identity, uniqueness, and history are what we are shooting for. Not a forceful assertion that not all jumpsuits are official "Onesies". I realize Gerber's lawyers are hyper aggressive on this enforcement and may have overseen the writing of this article, but Wikipedia doesn't work this way.  Them From  Space  07:26, 29 November 2013 (UTC)


 * I am inclined to agree. How do you think it should be made better? I remove some information which is more about legal questions than about the brand as such. There isn't even a word about the design or history of the Onesies infant bodysuit range here! Cecil Huber (talk) 21:41, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Redirect
I redirected the page to infant bodysuit now, because the only substatial information in the article was the fact that "Onesies" is a registered trademark (but it wasn't even clear about who owns it). The article has looked the same, like a mess, for some years now, and this fact about the trademark protection is already mentioned in the article it is now redirected to. Snowsuit Wearer (talk&#124;contribs) 19:26, 3 September 2016 (UTC)