Talk:Ons Heemecht

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the proposal was move. JPG-GR (talk) 05:55, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

The title is missspelled. See http://lb.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ons_Heemecht --217.86.28.51 (talk) 13:11, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Heemecht seems to be the convention.  Erudy (talk) 20:36, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment A little more evidence than a foreign Wikipedia link is gonna be needed to support this claim. (Google: "Ons Heemecht" -wikipedia = 1620, "Ons Hémécht" -wikipedia = 2640, "Ons Hemecht" - wikipedia = 1900; Google Scholar favors the proposal 5-to-1, though). JPG-GR (talk) 20:58, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Support. The Luxembourg government (see page linked from the article) use the proposed (Heemecht) spelling, which should be definitive enough. 78.105.161.182 (talk) 15:06, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Move Ons Heemecht to Ons Heemecht/version 2 and then Ons Hémécht to Ons Heemecht. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:03, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Ons Hémecht
Isn't Ons Hémecht the correct Luxembourgish spelling? —Brigade Piron (talk) 16:36, 19 June 2020 (UTC)