Talk:Ontario Highway 418/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk · contribs) 18:41, 11 April 2020 (UTC)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:


 * This was probably the easiest article to review since the issues were addressed in the peer review. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 18:41, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Review

 * Reference #7 should have the date of publication (March 6, 2007)
 * ✅ Username6892 19:02, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Easy pass. Congrats! HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 19:04, 11 April 2020 (UTC)