Talk:Ontario Highway 6/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: The Corvette ZR1 (talk · contribs) 16:50, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) No cleanup, POV, or unreferenced banners, no citation needed or clarify tags, no copyrighted material, no edit warring, and it looks good for reviewing. Note that this is my first review ever, so it will take a long time. (Criteria marked are unassessed)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
 * b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a. (reference section):
 * b. (citations to reliable sources):
 * The sources are mainly books, that I cannot verify as reliable or not.
 * c. (OR):
 * d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * Once again, since they are books, I cannot check for plagerisim.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Aaaaand we are good! Looks and feels beautiful, truly GA worthy. Pass!
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Aaaaand we are good! Looks and feels beautiful, truly GA worthy. Pass!
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Aaaaand we are good! Looks and feels beautiful, truly GA worthy. Pass!