Talk:Ontario Highway 64/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: EuroCarGT (talk · contribs) 22:46, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

I will be reviewing this Ontario highway-related article for good article article quality grading. I have this page on my watchlist. -- ///Euro Car GT  22:46, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Quick check

 * No dead links: ✅
 * No links to disambiguation page(s): ✅

Review
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Comments

 * Length of the article seems short and start class
 * All highway articles get three major sections: A description of the route, a retelling of the history, and a list of major intersections. This article may be short in length, but it comprehensively covers its subject with all the information that is available about it. Have a look at some of the other two-digit Ontario highway GAs for comparisons. -  Floydian  τ ¢  16:47, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I understand, I'm cool with that. As an experience editor like you I ensure you understand Good Articles and all, so I'll gt on this review tonight. -- ///Euro Car GT  20:25, 17 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Infobox is properly cited with reliable sources
 * Lead is good, may need some re-writing as some parts were hard to understand such as: as it arcs between Highway 69 and Highway 17, and provides a shortcut between the latter and Highway 11 northwest of North Bay - After North Bay, theirs no period.
 * Route description is good, gallery of 2 photos are good
 * History section is good
 * Major intersections is great and descriptive with the distances listed
 * References are good, all are in citing templates and no bare URLs
 * External links are useful + KML is useful

Their maybe rewording need in the route description and history section, it is good at it's current point but improvements could be used. -- ///Euro Car GT  02:11, 18 March 2014 (UTC)


 * I've puffed up the RD a little and made the fix to the lede, but I can't do much with the history. Let me know how it looks now. -  Floydian  τ ¢  21:39, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Great! I'm in the process of filling up the checklist and setting the result. The changes are great, especially with the new updated source. ///Euro Car  GT  01:15, 22 March 2014 (UTC)