Talk:Ontario Highway 7A/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  Dough 48  72  01:40, 3 August 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

 I will place the article on hold to allow for fixes to be made.  Dough 48  72  01:40, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * The sentence "Eventually, the abundance of farms fades into forests and the highway dives into and out of deep glacial ravines, the headwaters of the Pigeon River." sounds awkward.
 * "dives through a final ravine." also needs to be reworded.
 * "Drivers then proceed west", sounds awkward.
 * In the Development section, it jumps from describing dates in the 1800s to the 1900s and back to the 1800s. Is there a reason why this is done or is this perhaps an error?
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * I do not think the Ontario Back Road Atlas can support the physical surroundings of the road. Try using satellite imagery for this.
 * The first paragraph of the Development subsection of the History needs references.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Can some more historical information be added to the lead?
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Did some fixes. Thanks for catching that 1900s issue in the development, those dates should have been all in the 1800s (and are fixed now). I still have to add more refs for the surroundings of the RD, so I will let you know once that is done. The first part of History is a quick introduction, and all the facts should be repeated/sourced in the following two sections. I tried to cram some extra history into the lead, so let me know what you think for that one. -  ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ  τ ¢  22:49, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 * All set. -  ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ  τ ¢  04:21, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I will now pass the article.  Dough 48  72  04:24, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Close paraphrasing
The Duplication Detector shows some similarities that may need to be addressed. Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:17, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Mea culpa. Forgot that the duplication detector doesn't show quotation marks. Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:58, 9 August 2011 (UTC)