Talk:OoVoo

User base wasn't verified
I deleted the reference to a MarketWatch article claiming 35M Users WW as the article on MarketWatch was nowhere to be found. Would be great to have a solid reference — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.55.54.36 (talk) 00:08, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Written as advertisement issue
This article has the written has a written as advertisement issue. I'd be more critical of it, but this has become the norm in technology stubs. This is generally because the easiest to find sources are the company itself.

Generally we can count on this issue being fixed as we add more information.

Additional information that would be useful to is more company history, more history of major figures in the company, and more information about the protocols and technologies used. There is literally no information about protocols here.--Robert Wm &#34;Ruedii&#34; (talk) 19:28, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Combining three references (identically the same)
References #2, #3, and #4 are redundant, are they not? ^ http://www.oovoo.com/home.aspx Can't the three footnotes point to one reference? Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 01:32, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Engrish pwease
" including: PC, Mac, Android and iPhone.[14] oovoo a wonder full website was also us for awsome comings."

Seriously? Rtfmoz (talk) 23:36, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:AutoCAD which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 16:44, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Forced update
They forced an update on the user some 3 months ago. Since then, it does not work anymore. The user numbers they pretend to have cannot be correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:8C:4C22:8700:3CD1:3A35:8A93:F59C (talk) 21:44, 3 October 2017 (UTC)