Talk:OpenBSD/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: MrLinkinPark333 (talk · contribs) 02:33, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello! Thank you for submitting this article to Good Article Nominations. Unfortunately, I will have to quick-fail this article because this article is a long way from passing the Verifiability criteria. Looking through the sections, there are at least one citation missing in the History, Uses, Third Party and Open source sections. In the Security and distribution sections, multiple sentences are missing citations. However, my main concerns are the Development and subprojects section.

With the development section, there are two full paragraphs that do not have any citations. With this section alone, there are six uncited sentences in the Development section. Similarily, with the Development section there are nine referenced statements, with eight of them being bullet points. If I were to count the other sections (History, Uses, Open source, Security, Subprojects and distribution) I see at least 9 additional unreferenced sentences.

Without taking a full depth review, I spot at least over twenty unreferenced statements. With this in mind, this article is currently not close enough to pass Verifiability. Also, I noticed that this nomination is your only edit so far. I'm not sure if you've edited under a different account, but it is preferable that the nominator should be a major contributor when nominating an article at Good Article Nominations per Good article nominations/Instructions. Please feel free to nominate again once the article is in a better shape to be reviewed, especially with making sure that every sentence has been cited with reliable sources. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 02:33, 12 April 2020 (UTC)