Talk:OpenOffice Impress

STUB?
Isint this a stub? can anyone add the appropriate stub tag? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by The editor1 (talk • contribs) 10:44, 16 May 2007 (UTC).

Key advantage
I marked the statement about Impress's "key advantage" over PowerPoint being its open source nature. It is certainly open source, but there is no reference to say that this is Impress's key advantage. Sancho 22:53, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Contents
This page should probably have the contents summary at the top rather than most of the way down, and the main body of text could then be labelled something like 'overview'. 124.179.56.184 (talk) 11:27, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Open Source does not mean free of charge
I consider this paragraph inadequate:

"An advantage that Impress has over PowerPoint is that it is distributed under an open source licence and so is freely available for download without charge."

Open Source means you can have access to the source code. The source code is available, with or without charge. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tct13 (talk • contribs) 22:20, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

screenshot os
once apache relases aoo 3.4 i think we should change the openoffice screenshots from apache-open-office (aoo) running in ubuntu to aoo running in windows.

my rationale is that aoo is soon to become primarily a windows app. all linux distros have abandoned it and moved to libreoffice, therfore the article should not show aoo running ubuntu because this is misleading and not the most repsentative example of the aoo interface.

what do you think? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123465421jhytwretpo98721654 (talk • contribs) 02:54, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

i added a windows screenshot$${\rm By Kingo} + \underbrace{ {\rm \frac {g(s)+\varrho(\nabla \delta-\wp_\Lambda)}{\Upsilon}} }_{\rm Nagasaki} $$