Talk:OpenRISC

It seems that some of the external references are not connected to the article. Three references to Dynalith and one to OVP, neither of which are referenced in the article. I propose (subject to comments) to simplify to one reference to each, with an explanation of their relevance in the main text.Jeremybennett (talk) 16:19, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I think the same applies to the See Also links. I don't think LEON, OpenSPARC, S1 Core or Mico32 belong here. They are about open hardware designs in general. Jeremybennett (talk) 16:21, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I've pruned the references as suggested above. Jeremybennett (talk) 16:54, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

I believe the article now establishes notability and should no longer be categorized as a stub. I've requested an assessment from the Computer Hardware task force. Jeremybennett (talk) 17:24, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Importance
Tagged this article as low importance.  - down  load  |   sign!  22:16, 7 April 2009 (UTC) How do you decide that it is of low importance? This is one of more known soft-core architectures. It is of course a specialist subject, but in this field (FPGA/Softcore) this is an important matter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.21.25.56 (talk) 20:00, 9 May 2012 (UTC)