Talk:Open Era tennis records – Women's singles/Archive 1

Created Article
Hi have created this article for continuity in other tennis records Overall tennis records – Men's Singles, Tennis records of the Open Era – Men's Singles etc. All wiki tennis project members and other editors are welcome to review and help improve the page. --Navops47 (talk) 13:15, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Alignment technical errors in the tables
Hi I can't seem to rectify the alignment errors in the tables can anbody help to fix them.--Navops47 (talk) 11:50, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Fixed, previous section had a missing col-end.--Wolbo (talk) 11:58, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
 * You are a star :) thanks --Navops47 (talk) 13:04, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Tennis records of the Open Era – men's singles which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 02:01, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Prize money inflation adjusted?
The records are all in the recent years and for example Kerber did not have nearly as much success as Graf in her prime. Do prize moneys increase so much more than inflation or is that just not corrected for?--Crotopaxi (talk) 17:15, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Misc. comments
There must be a mistake: The list of most tournaments won displays in the wrong section, under "career season streaks." — Preceding unsigned comment added by AshtarGent (talk • contribs) 10:52, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Billie-Jean King has won Wimbledon 6 times and the US Open 4 times. However here in the section Titles won per tournament it says only 4 for Wimbledon and 3 for the US Open ? Makes me wonder what other errors there well may be since I noticed this straight away. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.254.87.131 (talk) 20:52, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Match winning percentage by court type
Margaret Court has been removed from these lists? Her overall percentage is listed, but the numbers on Margaret Court for grass should put her on that list. I also think she should be on the hard court list, but someone's come up with an arbitrary "must have at least 200 wins" condition, presumably in order to omit her? You only need 90 wins on clay or 40 on grass/carpet, but obviously setting a limit of 100 wins on hard courts wasn't enough.

I know she's a horrible person, but she's a horrbile person with multiple tennis records, and this is just an attempt to whitewash her from history. Regardless of that, the grass-winning percentage is a factually incorrect table without her at the top: 293-22, 93.01%. I suspect she should be on the clay list as well, or was the "90 wins" limit chosen because she has 80-something on that surface? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.40.193.182 (talk) 17:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Match wins % year End tournament
The need for 8 match wins to get the potential to be considered for this list is way over the top. Seeing Hingis scrape in makes one wonder how many people who have attended multiple tournaments have missed out. This should be reduced to attending a minimum of two such tournaments. Antipodenz (talk) 09:38, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

All four finals
Navratilova is recorded as winning all four finals in 1986 despite only winning three. The justification is that the AO was not played that year. OK so based on this theory (which, by the way, makes an implicit assumption that she would have attended and won this tournament) we should accept that in 2020 Wimbledon can be awarded to someone suitable, that give tournaments had to be won in 1977 when there were two AO to get a GS that year, and well the list is quite long really. So it’s tough luck, worse occurred for many players in the war years or when women couldn’t play in tournaments created as they were for men only or lacked a doubles category for them and so on. Navratilova won titles, not four. Please amend this. Antipodenz (talk) 09:53, 28 September 2021 (UTC)