Talk:Operación Milagro

Adding new information and detail
Hello, For this article, I would like to greatly expand it in order to provide sufficient information that will push it past a stub-class article. WikiProject Cuba mentions that this article needs an infobox, which I will also add, as I have had experience in creating infoboxes. As for the organization of my research for the article, I will be emulating the headings on the Spanish version of the article, with some modifications. This includes a Context section, a section on the Operation's objectives, as well as a section on the effects of the initiative. Outside of the article itself, I am also going to create a disambiguation page for the term "Operation Miracle," as there are many instances of that term on Wikipedia, creating some confusion. Below are some of the sources I will use to gather this information, written in Chicago citation style. Thank you!

Kirk, Emily. “OPERATION MIRACLE: A NEW VISION OF PUBLIC HEALTH?” International Journal of Cuban Studies 3, no. 4 (2011): 366–81. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41945963.

Kirk, John M. “Operación Milagro.” In Healthcare without Borders: Understanding Cuban Medical Internationalism. Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2015.

Lamrani, Salim. “THE BOUVARIAN ALLIANCE FOR THE PEOPLES OF OUR AMERICA: THE CHALLENGES OF SOCIAL INTEGRATION.” International Journal of Cuban Studies 4, no. 3/4 (2012): 347–65. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41946016.

Zperrier25 (talk) 17:43, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Bias
The International Journal of Cuban Studies is a publication of Pluto Press, a Marxist publisher. Helen Yaffe is a left-wing pro-Castro writer. Granma and Cubadebate are both controlled by the Communist Party of Cuba. It is okay to have some biased sources in some circumstances. But when this many sources are biased in one direction, the article has a major problem. 2600:8806:6101:1700:B040:B741:FBE8:6BB4 (talk) 23:08, 13 March 2023 (UTC)


 * You should feel free to bring forward any additional sources you feel make sense to include. And if you believe there's a specific factual problem, raise it.
 * But it does not appear have a problem here. First, there are a number of other sources relief on apart from those you mention. Second, the reliable source policy states, "Reliable sources are not required to be neutral, unbiased, or objective." JArthur1984 (talk) 23:31, 13 March 2023 (UTC)