Talk:Operating System Embedded

1 March 2007 comment
According to Bengt Eliasson himself, he did not write the original kernel. In fact, he was sceptical as to whether message passing was a good approach due to lack of performance. A colleague however, Johan Forneus wrote a proof-of-concept kernel in two weeks which convinced Eliasson. They used this code to further develop what would later become OSE in 1985.

OSE was also originally intended to be named OSX, but the trademark was already in use. Instead, starting from OSA the final suggestion adopted was OSE. Originally, this was not an acronym but the result of enumerating OS*-combinations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.253.67.135 (talk • contribs) 22:37, 1 March 2007 and updated by  at 13:46, 10 June 2010

Image copyright problem with File:ENEA AB logo.png
The image File:ENEA AB logo.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
 * That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --07:50, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Citation is wrong
"Enea OSE is one of the most widely used RTOSes in the world. According to mobile analyst firm, VisionMobile, OSE has been deployed in over 1.75 billion mobile handsets, as of the end of June 2010."

The citation for this information links to a webpage that describes the market share of phones and their OSs. And not once is OSE mentioned. In fact I was unable to find any information about what phones OSE ships on, only that it supports phone chipsets. It is possible that the numbers are cumulative over the course of OSE's existance, either way the citation is wrong.

It certainly does seem that this page is a false advertisement. It should be removed, someone who has better information about this company's OS can be free to redo the page but for the mean time it's lies do not need to be here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.149.76.38 (talk) 17:36, 6 June 2013 (UTC)