Talk:Operation Bertram/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sven Manguard (talk · contribs) 02:42, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

GAN Quicksheet 1.23 SM (Criteria)

Starting comments: Looks interesting.

1. Well written: 
 * a. prose/copyright: I moved a section around, because it felt out of place where it was. Other than that, it was fine. Pictogram resolved.svg
 * b. MoS compliance: Pictogram resolved.svg

2. Accurate and verifiable: 
 * a. provides references: Obviously I'm assuming good faith on the printed materials. Dazzled and Deceived: Mimicry and Camouflage sounds like a fascinating read (just from the title) but I don't have any of the books. Pictogram resolved.svg
 * b. proper citation use: Pictogram resolved.svg
 * c. no original research: Pictogram resolved.svg

3. Broad in coverage: 
 * a. covers main aspects: Pictogram resolved.svg
 * b. focused/on topic: Pictogram resolved.svg

4. Neutral:

5. Stable:

6. Image use: 
 * a. license/tagging correct: Always nice to see properly done FURs. Saves me the time of fixing them. Pictogram resolved.svg
 * b. relevant/properly captioned: Pictogram resolved.svg

7. Additional items not required for a GA, but requested by the reviewer:
 * a. images that should have alt texts have them: Pictogram voting delete.svg Please consider doing this, as it does have a big impact on accessibility. Done.
 * b. general catch all and aesthetics: Meh. I don't really love the image placement, some things butt into sections they shouldn't, but it's nothing major.

Comments after the initial review: Was interesting. Little piece of history I never knew about. Solid piece of work, I'm happy to promote this.  S ven M anguard  Wha?  03:26, 6 January 2013 (UTC)