Talk:Operation Hannover

Rating
I have completed the B class review of this article and believe that it is currently a Start class. I believe that it could be improved by addressing the following:


 * Coverage: the article currently seems to be a bit light on content. Could the operation be discussed in more detail, along with some analysis of the aftermath or how it effected the overall campaign?
 * Grammar: I think that there is a tense issue in the prose that could be fixed by a copy edit. For example in the Background section "...Soviet partisans have been...". As this article refers to something that occured in the past, perhaps it should say "...Soviet partisans had been..." There seem to be other examples as well, for example use of "is" when perhaps "was" would be better.

Just a couple of ideas. If you wish to have more in depth comments, you might like to submit the article to peer review. This can be done by adding it to the list at WP:MHPR. When you feel like you would like it to be re-assessed, this can be done by adding it to the list at WP:MHA. Hope this helps. AustralianRupert (talk) 23:50, 18 April 2009 (UTC)