Talk:Operation Inherent Resolve/Archive 1

Scope of the article
I am strongly of the opinion that this article should contain a sentence of two about the American actions against ISIS-affiliated islamists in Syria, Iraq and elsewhere on their respective articles, a paragraph or two about the origin of the name/controversy and nothing else. Juno (talk) 07:16, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I agree, this should not be like the actual parent article. - SantiLak  (talk) 08:37, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned references in Operation Inherent Resolve
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Operation Inherent Resolve's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "1,300 more US soldiers deployed to Iraq": From American-led intervention in Iraq (2014–present): http://www.stripes.com/news/us/1-000-soldiers-from-the-82nd-airborne-headed-to-iraq-1.320194 From Military intervention against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant:  

Reference named "ISIL militants captured in Egyptian ground assault": From Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant occupation of Derna:  From Military intervention against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant:  

Reference named "telegraph": From Anwar al-Awlaki:  From Military intervention against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant: </li> <li>From Al-Qaeda: </li> <li>From Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda link allegations timeline: </li> </ul>

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:31, 17 April 2015 (UTC)