Talk:Operation Ladbroke/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  Sp33dyphil  "Ad astra" 06:58, 18 July 2011 (UTC)


 * First impression
 * Well-written article. No major issues.


 * Lead
 * Good lead – informative, summarises article. No action required.


 * Background
 * No action required.


 * Planing
 * No action required.


 * Images, references and external links
 * Please add alt text to images.
 * It's not a requirement for GA or even FA


 * Add years of publication next to author's last name eg. Warren 1955, p. 21.
 * Done


 * "London, United Kingdom : Kimber." no need to mention the UK, as London is well-known. If you insist, shorten it to UK.
 * Done Jim Sweeney (talk) 17:06, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

I find the article very informative and well-written. I find it really hard to find any flaws and mistakes. Very confident this article will be promoted to FA status. I'll be there for the FAC.  Sp33dyphil  "Ad astra" 07:47, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
 * End note