Talk:Operation Mascot/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 07:18, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

I'll start this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 07:18, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot Nick-D (talk) 09:48, 6 January 2014 (UTC)


 * No DABs, external links are fine, although linkchecker tool reports 403 on uboat.net links.
 * Both are working fine: uboat.net and the linkchecker tool don't seem to get on well Nick-D (talk) 23:08, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Images appropriately licensed.
 * Link fighter(s), dive bomber, radar, submarine in the lede. And Corsair and Barracuda in the caption in the infobox photo.
 * Done Nick-D (talk) 23:08, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * More needed links: Norwegian Sea, fjord, German Navy, ditch
 * Done Nick-D (talk) 23:08, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * By MOS:DATE, ordinals are forbidden. 12 May, not the 12th of May.
 * I think that it's OK in this sentence (the alternative is to repeat "July" in the same sentence, unless you have a better solution). I've used this kind of wording successfully in FAs. Nick-D (talk) 23:08, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I've had some success using "x days later". Forex off on the 24th of the month could be rephrased "three days later". But I'm not going to get to fussed about it as this is only a GA review.
 * Provide conversions for bomb weights
 * Done Nick-D (talk) 23:08, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * as the veteran veteran"s"
 * Done
 * Suggest a comma after At 21:48 on 17 July and after Following the failure of Operation Goodwood
 * Done for the first one, but given that the second sentence is short I don't think a comma is needed Nick-D (talk) 23:08, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I tend to add a comma for an initial subordinate clause if it's about six words or longer, but that's just me.
 * What state for Philadelphia?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:50, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Pennsylvania. Not sure that specifying a state is necessary given that it's a large and well known city with a significant publishing industry. Thanks a lot for your review! Nick-D (talk) 23:08, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I think that when I worked in the library, the rule was that only Boston and New York didn't need state identifiers, but that was many, many, many moons ago. I think that we're good to go here.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:57, 12 January 2014 (UTC)