Talk:Operation Whirlwind/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 18:12, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

I'll get to this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:12, 7 June 2013 (UTC)


 * planned, supported and executed at operational group and unit level "at operational group and unit level" is redundant, especially considering the beginning of the next paragraph.
 * Removed.
 * Delete "the": secure the Papuk Mountain and in the Operation Otkos 10
 * Done.
 * Don't capitalize unless it has a name or number: Armoured-mechanised conversely, capitalize this 592nd and the 622nd mechanised brigades
 * Done.
 * This is awkward: change of the commander did not produce any results in terms of use of the unit in the offensive
 * Reworded - Could you please have another look at it?
 * "The" command post Command post of the 102nd
 * Added.
 * Awkward: last remaining tank blown up using explosives to prevent its capture.
 * Reworded - Hopefully new structure makes more sense.
 * Images appropriately licensed.
 * No overlinks, one circular DAB that needs to be fixed, and one external link that timed out.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:38, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I also see Checklinks reporting one of the refs timing out ("Jutarnji list" article, connection issue) but the link actually works fine - at least for me. Should I try to do something about it anyway?
 * Lemme try it and see if works for me. If it does, then you don't need to do anything about it.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:48, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Nope, timed out for me just now.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:08, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * That's weird. Works for me, tried to archive the ref and use the archive, but the web cite service could not access the article either. Mercifully, author of the text writes for two different newspaper and was kind enough to post the same article with two different newspapers the same day - simply changing the title. Hope that one works.--Tomobe03 (talk) 19:39, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Good to go.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:09, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The toolserver might be acting up a bit here. I also get the DAB Links result that the article contains a link to "Operation Vihor" which points back at the same article - only it does not. I even tried searching for word "vihor" in edit mode to find that link but there is none.--Tomobe03 (talk) 19:05, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * OK, don't sweat it then.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:08, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Rechecked again, this time via "what links here" function at the redirect page - and the results included not only the Operation Whirlwind but also a wide array of other Croatian-battles-related pages. I suspect a couple of navboxes are the culprits, and I modified them accordingly. I think DABlinks needs a while to register the changes to the navboxes, but I hope that will resolve the issue.--Tomobe03 (talk) 10:49, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the review. I'll try to address your concerns with this article immediately.--Tomobe03 (talk) 18:32, 13 June 2013 (UTC)