Talk:Operational BIM

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... OrthoGraph, the owner of the content in question has give a Declaration of consent via e-mail to Wikipedia.
 * Thank you for your response. Please sign your additions to this Talk page using four tilde (~) characters. Paul W (talk) 18:29, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
 * The speedy deletion proposed by another editor was overturned as the apparent copyright violation was reversed by the website author allowing the content's use. I had simultaneously proposed deletion (WP:PROD} arguing that any material details about 'operational BIM' from this article could be merged into the main building information modeling article. On its own, the subject matter's notability is debatable (less than 5000 Google search engine hits), and it currently has few independent sources references (apart from a vague list of external links). Short of deletion, it requires a comprehensive rewrite to achieve an encyclopedic style. Paul W (talk) 20:01, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Merge
Per the discussion above, especially 's comments, I have placed merge tags on both articles. I would do the merge myself, but I have absolutely no idea what the articles are about. Jdcooper (talk) 04:03, 27 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Agree Merge. Any useful and reliably sourced content from this article (Operational BIM]) should be merged into the main BIM article. This article can then be deleted / redirected to the BIM article. Will give this a couple of days to see if there is any meaningful discussion here; if not, then will be Bold per WP:AFM. Paul W (talk) 11:58, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't think we are going to see any other input, this is not a well-loved article.. Jdcooper (talk) 23:46, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Boldly merged. Paul W (talk) 11:12, 8 January 2024 (UTC)