Talk:Opinion polling for the 2021 Peruvian general election

Poor citation of polling and IDICE
The use of IDICE polls here is questionable, especially when the citation source is a right-wing Twitter account (https://twitter.com/Datoworld/status/1388162981712773126). The sources for the last poll don't even share the same numbers. Not to mention the questionable links the pollster shares with right-wing influences. We can do better than this. --ZX2021 (talk) 20:50, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

- Going off this, the new "CIT" poll being cited now does not have a full report with methodology on the pollster's website (http://citopinion.pe/publicaciones_opinion_y_mercado.html). If no one can track down the full report with methodology on the internet, then that poll should not be included. This is the standard across Wikipedia as far as I know. What are we doing here? --ZX2021 (talk) 14:58, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:10, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Avanza País 2021.jpg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:22, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
 * FREPAP Logo.jpg

"Analysis" section uses left-wing smear terms...
such as "Catholic extremism", "far-right" and "neoliberal". Sounds like the author of this article has a personal bias in favor of the left and far-left causes. Therefore the article is not objective and neutrally written. 2003:DA:C72C:BF00:DD16:8E57:402A:B06E (talk) 23:27, 23 October 2023 (UTC)