Talk:Opisthosporidia

Why Zoosporia?
There are no sources I've seen that say Zoosporia is a taxon, let alone a synonym (or a parent taxon according to this unreferenced taxobox template) of Opisthosporidia. Why does it appear in the taxobox as such? ☽ ☾ 16:22, 7 November 2022 (UTC)


 * @ User:Snoteleks: I agree with deletion of Zoosporia. Nowadays mycologists define Fungi not only as True fungi (Eumycota), but include also the basal lineages as Rozellomycota and Aphelidiomycota (see the refs, ). The taxon or clade Zoosporia (not used nowadays) had the same meaning and so it was a junior synonym to Fungi. (Well, some protistologists insist in narrower definition of the taxon Fungi to keep the opisthosporidian lineages in their area of interest :-), see )
 * Note 1: The recent position of the clade/kingdom Fungi R.H. Whittaker, Quart. Rev. Biol. 34:220. 1959 (see ; syn.  Zoosporia) := Nucletmycea (junior synonym Holomycota) − Cristidiscoidea sensu lato (taxon Rotosphaerida with junior synonyms Nucleariae, Cristidiscoidia or Cristidiscoidea)
 * Note 2: The contents of the clade are Rozellomyceta (= Cryptomycota/Rozellida + Microsporidia) + Aphelidiomyceta (Aphelida/Aphelidiomycota) + Eumycota (= Chytridiomyceta (= Neocallimastigomycota + Monoblepharomycota + Caulochytriomycota + Chytridiomycota) + Blastocladiomycota + Sanchytriomycota + Amastigomycota) + few minor basal lineages without oficial description (BCG1, BCG2, GS01) (for taxons with red links or without links see refs, , for minor basal lineages , , , ; see also the taxobox in Fungus)
 * I would also appreciate to present Opisthosporidia as "Opisthosporidia" in the taxobox because it seems to be a paraphyletic taxon. Petr Karel (talk) 15:36, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * @Petr Karel Hey, so just to be sure, the current phylogenetic positions are:
 * Is this right? This would mean Holomycota is still a clade supported by some mycologists/protistologists? As for the deletion of Zoosporia, I'll try to do it myself, and also fix the Opisthosporidia thing. Thanks for your answer :) ☽ ☾ 16:11, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * @ User:Snoteleks: Sorry for late answer, I was offline in my holiday. Small clarification: "old" Fungi = True Fungi (Eumycota), "new" Fungi according mycologists include also Rozellomyceta and Aphelidiomyceta (protistologists often consider these two groups as Protista, not Fungi). No change in the clade/taxon Holomycota Liu et al. 2009 (in fact a junior synonyme to Nucletmycea Brown et al. 2009 ; Nucletmycea should be preferred according to the nomenclature code, but the name Holomycota is created similar to Holozoa which could be the reason for more frequent use) - the clade/taxon(superkingdom) Nucletmycea/Holomycota is supported by mycologists (Tedersoo et al., adopted by broad international cooperation - Wijayawardene et al., 2020 ) as well as protistologists (broad international cooperation - Adl et al., 2019 ):
 * --Petr Karel (talk) 10:12, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
 * --Petr Karel (talk) 10:12, 21 November 2022 (UTC)