Talk:Oppenheimer security clearance hearing/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Djmaschek (talk · contribs) 02:35, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Review
Just a few typos so far. Djmaschek (talk) 02:35, 10 September 2015 (UTC) Here are more. Djmaschek (talk) 03:14, 10 September 2015 (UTC) That's all - just small stuff. Very good article. Djmaschek (talk) 03:29, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Robert Oppenheimer, paragraph 3: "it was Lawrence that..." (who)
 * ✅ Corrected. Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:07, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Chevalier incident, paragraph 4: "foundJohn" (space)
 * ✅ Corrected. Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:07, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Postwar conflicts, paragraph 4: "developing the Super". I was born in the USA in 1953 but had no idea what "Super" meant. It later dawned on me that this must be "H-bomb" in American English. Please decipher this for American readers. Suggest: "Super (H-bomb)"
 * ✅ It's a long story, with an article of its own. They worked on it through the Manhattan Project and into the 1950s. Oppenheimer, Bethe, Goeppert-Mayer and Fermi all had a go at it. Eventually Ulam and Teller figured it out. Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:39, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Postwar conflicts, paragraph 5: "referred top" (to)
 * ✅ Corrected. Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:39, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Scope of testimony, last paragraph: "Robb to testified" (testify)
 * ✅ Corrected. Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:39, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
 * The board's decision, paragraph 2: "conduct reflect" (reflects or reflect[s], since it's inside a quote)
 * ✅ Corrected. Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:39, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your review! Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:39, 10 September 2015 (UTC)