Talk:Oppo phones

Merger
Is there a reason this shouldn't be merged into OPPO? It seems a bit frivolous to have a seperate page for the products, even Apple Inc. leaves the product descriptions on the main page.Xevus11 (talk) 06:01, 14 June 2018 (UTC)


 * It was my idea. The reasoning is that Oppo has alot of different phones and it would be irrelevant and make the Oppo article too long and unreadable taking into account for future phones. An example where I have done this is the Xiaomi article where we have been shortening it lately and separating info in separate articles for readability, no one seems to have objections so far. My reasoning for Apple Inc. not having a separate page is they have fewer products and or product lines so it is possible to summarise each product line in the main article and go in depth for each product separately. Since each individual phone from Oppo does not have it's separate page, I was thinking this would be a better place to put them all and let the Oppo article concern more about the company rather than phones.  Araratic  &#124; talk  06:25, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * That makes sense, im glad I asked before throwing down the PFD. I have approved the page with NPP tools, happy editing.Xevus11 (talk) 06:54, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Requested move 26 June 2018

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: page moved. per consistency. Mahveotm (talk) 09:12, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Phones of OPPO → Phones of Oppo – It seems like the capitalisation of Oppo is not needed now, as shown in the main article of the company Oppo. Wefk423 (talk) 14:29, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment. Yeah, consistency would be great whichever name is chosen.  Araratic  &#124; talk  00:37, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * In other words I do not have an opinion on which spelling, I just think both articles should share the same spelling ~  Araratic  &#124; talk  12:16, 27 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Merge doesn't require a separate article. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:18, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't think you understood what this page move was talking about. It is regarding the capitalisation or not of "Oppo", not whether this article should exist. Anyways, the arguments for that are above in the previous discussion. ~  Araratic  &#124; talk  12:16, 27 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:52, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
 * OPPO-R17-Steamer-Blue-696x435.jpg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:22, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Oppo R9.png

ROM means Read-Only Memory
Someone may confuse about tables headings. I suspect the "ROM" column wanted to mean "Internal memory" and not to be read-only. Narcis Garcia (talk) 09:12, 14 July 2024 (UTC)