Talk:Opposition to the India–United States Civil Nuclear Agreement in India

Untitled
which idiot wrote this page.it is completely biased and filled with grammatical errors. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.211.128.98 (talk) 10:19, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

This article has signs of obvious bias
"The Left parties opposition is genuine. ...For this Nuclear Deal UPA Government is surrendering India's pride."

a. That the Left parties' opposition is genuine is obviously partisan. b. No references or published evidence for the allegation of Governmental corruption. c. "surrendering India's pride" - that's again a matter of debate, and a partisan viewpoint of opponents to the nuclear deal. This section should be deleted. Random meche (talk) 16:53, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 one external links on Opposition to the Indo-US civilian agreement in India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080219052214/http://www.indianexpress.com:80/story/239308._.html to http://www.indianexpress.com/story/239308._.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071215045640/http://www.indianexpress.com:80/story/213083.html to http://www.indianexpress.com/story/213083.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071215045643/http://www.indianexpress.com:80/story/213652.html to http://www.indianexpress.com/story/213652.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 05:07, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Credibility of opposition from some scientists
I recently came across the following excerpt from the book The Accidental Prime Minister: The Making and Unmaking of Manmohan Singh by Sanjaya Baru, page number 136: "“Many retired nuclear scientists came out of the woodwork wanting to be ‘consulted’ and to be seen as part of the historic process. One such senior scientist even sent me his biodata and urged me to get him appointed as an adviser to the PM. When this did not happen, he became a severe critic of the nuclear deal.”-Sanjaya Baru" This excerpt certainly puts some question marks on the credibility of some statements by scientists on the nuclear deal. I propose that this excerpt be mentioned in the article. &#8212;&#x202F; Vaibhavafro &#x202F;&#128172; 13:46, 4 June 2020 (UTC)