Talk:Optonica

A good start
This is an good start for what could be an excellent article. But it has a few problems.


 * no cites. It mentions sources, but it's unclear what's coming from where.
 * it offers too many unattributed opinions. Wikipedia doesn't declare what's remarkable or beautiful.  It states facts and leaves the opinions to others.
 * the tone is just a bit too much like an essay of personal observations
 * it overreaches in deciding what motivated Sharp, and what the legacy of Optonica is. Again, this is not for Wikipedia to decide.
 * it uses weasel words, like "probably" and "considered"

-- Escape Orbit (Talk) 22:21, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Main reference
A reference is obviously needed for Optonica sales catalogue OP-FB 10/77 --Brenont (talk) 22:55, 31 July 2016 (UTC)