Talk:Opus Sanctorum Angelorum

NPOV
The current article portrays this organization in such a favorable light that it seems to me to be a candidate for an NPOV rewrite. -- Chronulator (talk) 00:56, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * It would be helpful if you would indicate concretely what, if anything, you consider to be unsourced or unbalanced in the article as it stands. With reliable citations, the article reports how controversy about the association caused it to be subjected to examination by the Holy See, that the Holy See expressed strictures with regard to it and suggested remedies, and that after implementation of those remedies it gave official approval to the association.  If you want the article to present also a view different from the Holy See's, it is up to you to add that other view to the article, not of course on the basis of your own personal opinion, but by citing reliable sources for it.  Objective evidence of lack of a neutral point of view has not been presented.  Esoglou (talk) 11:21, 2 February 2011
 * What I have found out so far about this organization, The present article is a very good summary. The article is objective as far as reliable and trustworthy sources are available. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.142.174.23 (talk • contribs)

Please watch this article
In July 2019 there were some edits that contradicted all given sources. I have restored the last bot version in line with the facts, anybody who understands Portuguese or German can check the sources. Please have an eye on future edits. Thank you and best regards, Agathenon (talk) 13:23, 22 August 2019 (UTC)