Talk:Orange-headed tanager/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jens Lallensack (talk · contribs) 22:41, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Reading soon. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 22:41, 3 January 2022 (UTC)


 * upperparts – not explained in linked article, link to Birdgloss instead?
 * Replaced all links to upperparts and underparts with birdgloss.
 * No this does not work, you need to use the template as explained in Talk:Glossary of bird terms. And there is still one link to the anatomy article left (that still does not work). --Jens Lallensack (talk) 15:29, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Added the links, using the bird gloss template this time.


 * Females are similar, but are duller. – Maybe "Femals are similar but duller"?
 * Done.


 * generic name – link
 * Reworded instead, no good target.
 * Rewording is ok, maybe even better, but you could have used Generic name (biology). --Jens Lallensack (talk) 15:29, 5 January 2022 (UTC)


 * In the main text you link some country names but not others (e.g., Bolivia, Brazil)
 * Per MOS:OVERLINKING, I've tried to avoid linking countries that everybody is likely to know (Brazil, Argentina, Venezuela), but linked the rest.
 * It's a minor thing and completely your call, but I'm confused that "Venezuela" is more well-known than, e.g., "Peru"? My intuition would be the other way around. Not being consistent here has slightly confused me. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 15:29, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Well, imo, Venezuela is pretty well-known due to its status as a major oil producer, as well as its economic crisis. The other countries are very well-known outside of the Americas. It isn't a big deal, I could link Venezuela as well if you want.


 * less extensive yellow on the head, – Do you possibly mean "intensive", or is the yellow area indeed smaller in females?
 * Extensive is correct.


 * Do you know if the shown photographs show males or females?
 * No.


 * nest about 2 m (6.6 ft) after the ground. – "over"?
 * Replaced with above.


 * What about vocalisations? --Jens Lallensack (talk) 16:39, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Completely forgot about that, added now. AryKun (talk) 03:40, 5 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The taxonbox mentions "Nemosia chrysopis" as a synonym, but not the main text. Mention that the subspecies was once considered a species of its own? Also, this name needs a redirect.
 * Created redirects, and added bit to subspecies section.


 * Link "crowns" (to birdgloss?) --Jens Lallensack (talk) 15:29, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Done. AryKun (talk) 03:19, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Closing note: Thanks for the fixes, looks all good now. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 12:18, 7 January 2022 (UTC)