Talk:Orbiter (Canada's Wonderland)

GA nomination - premature?
I believe this article isn't ready for a GA review just yet. Looking at the good article criteria: Personally, I would try and fix these things before nominating it to become a good article (please note this is a very brief look at the criteria - even if these issues are resolved the article will probably still have a fair way before it could become a GA). Themeparkgc  Talk  23:43, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Well-written - it seems okay, but there are a few sentences that need fixing
 * 2) Refs - this article has no reliable sources. The sources it does have are either from fan sites or videos.
 * 3) Coverage - good, however I feel the description of the ride experience could be extended to provide a bit better summary.
 * 4) Neutral - seems to be neutral
 * 5) Stable - yes
 * 6) Images - no images. Since the ride is still operating, a free image could still be created.


 * Dom497, the primary author of this article and the nominator for GA status, has recently retired from Wikipedia. He offered me the job of taking over from his pending nominations. Based upon my comments above, I have withdrawn this article from nomination. Themeparkgc   Talk  22:51, 7 November 2011 (UTC)