Talk:Orchestral Works by Tomas Svoboda/Archive 1

COI
In accordance with Conflict of interest and Plain and simple conflict of interest guide, I have chosen to disclose that I have a personal connection to this subject. I will spare details, but my main purpose in writing this article is to benefit Wikipedia and its mission. I believe this article is written from a neutral perspective and has been constructed from independent, reliable sources. The second link above provides the following summary, which I believe I have followed appropriately:


 * Be transparent about your conflict of interest (✅)
 * Subjects require significant coverage in independent reliable sources. (✅)
 * Your role is to inform and reference, not promote or sell. (✅)
 * Be extremely cautious about the risks of editing articles about yourself or your clients (✅|N/A)
 * If writing a draft, write without bias, as if you don't work for the company or personally know the subject. (✅)
 * State facts and statistics, don't be vague or general. (✅)
 * Take time to get sources and policy right. (✅)
 * Get neutral, uninvolved, disinterested editors to review your draft.
 * Work with the community and we'll work with you.
 * Communicate, communicate, communicate.

My goal is to promote this article to Good status. I understand this will require review and assistance from other members of the community, which is great. I invite all to examine this article carefully to make sure the content is fair and accurate. Feel free to contact me if you have any concerns. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 22:04, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Update: Submitted request for copy edit by GOCE. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 23:46, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Copy edit
Would you mind taking a look at this edit on more time? Having "the latter" and two variations of "the concerto" in the same sentence bothers me a bit. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 03:51, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I adjusted it. See if you like my version better. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I do. Thank you for reviewing the article. You corrected some sloppy mistakes on my part. I did, however, move the recording credits back to the prose section. Apart from that, I agree with all of your improvements to the article. Thank you, again. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 20:38, 9 February 2014 (UTC)