Talk:Orchid (hardcore punk band)

Untitled
Someone find the years for their releases!

wow this is cool guys —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.228.116.17 (talk) 09:32, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

OR
I tagged the article as OR for the simple reason that there are unreferenced assertions about what the band think. Something like that needs to be cited to source, and if you got it straight from band members, it doesn't belong on Wikipedia, but should rather be published elsewhere before being referenced here. Also, all claims in Wikipedia need references per official policy WP:CITE. mg e kelly 02:51, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Vague description
What exactly is "post-modern aesthetic"? I was always led to believe that most art produced post-1970 was post-modern. Unnecessarily confusing, and doesn't provide an adequate description of the music: somone who knows what the band's about should change it. 203.206.249.161 04:00, 26 October 2006 (UTC)


 * You're right that everything is "postmodern" nowadays, but what Orchid were is "postmodernist": with a band that throws a wall of Foucault, Nietzsche, Situationist and Frankfurt School references at you there shouldn't be any doubt about it. Plus they used to distribute their music in a way that seems coherent with Baudrillardian views on the media (or at least, something derived from similar views such as what's exposed in Marcuse's One-Dimensional Man, which would, again, be coherent with citing the Frankfurt School or the Situationists.) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.43.180.201 (talk) 16:45, 23 January 2007 (UTC).

Fair use rationale for Image:EB45.jpg
Image:EB45.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:53, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:EB51.jpg
Image:EB51.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:54, 2 January 2008 (UTC)