Talk:Order of Heptasophs/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:12, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I'll review this. Will jot some queries below: Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:12, 1 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Can't end a sentence with ", etc."


 * Allegedly the ancient King of Persia would select six Magi ... - I'd make it more definitive that it was a story they told, so something like "They reported/recalled/claimed the ancient King of Persia would select six Magi....."


 * Why is "introduced" in quote marks?


 * What happens after 1877? Does the organisation die out/grow/what?


 * Sourcing seems a bit meagre. A cyclopedia is a tertiary source. Surely something more has been written?


 * Book sources need ISBNs

That's enough to get started. More later. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:12, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

1. Well written?:
 * Prose quality: - first pass found issues still unfixed.
 * Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
 * References to sources:
 * Citations to reliable sources, where required:
 * No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:
 * Major aspects:  - sparse sourcing noted above. Appear to be large gaps in coverage.
 * Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
 * Fair representation without bias: - seems to be neutral

5. Reasonably stable?
 * No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
 * Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: - sorry, issues of comprehensiveness and referencing unaddressed. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:30, 23 January 2014 (UTC)