Talk:Oregon Route 120/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: TheWombatGuru (talk · contribs) 21:05, 22 December 2014 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose):
 * Route description: The second time you mention it following the railway tracks, should BNSF be omitted? TheWombatGuru (talk) 21:05, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I think it should be kept because if I say "continues to follow railway tracks" who is going to know which company owns the track? (BNSF or Union Pacific?) -- BloonsTDFan360  (Park and Ride) 23:39, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I didn't know there were two major companies, who operate in the same area, it works differently in my country. TheWombatGuru (talk) 23:48, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
 * b (MoS):
 * History: "During the Oregon Transportation Commission meeting in July 24, 2002, the commission approved the OR 120 designation to placed on the Swift Highway." - Should it be "... designation to be placed ...". TheWombatGuru (talk) 21:05, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Done. -- BloonsTDFan360  (Park and Ride) 23:39, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references):
 * b (citations to reliable sources):
 * c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects):
 * Route description: What kind of bridge does it use to cross Columbia Slough, does it have a name?; maybe something could be said about the route being in Multnomah County in the route description or lead? TheWombatGuru (talk)
 * By looking at street view, I'm not sure what is the type of the bridge over the Columbia Slough. According to History of State Highways in Oregon, the name of the bridge is Columbia Slough Bridge, so I'll put the name on the article. Instead of putting Multnomah County, I have put that the route is within the city limits of Portland in the route description. -- BloonsTDFan360  (Park and Ride) 23:39, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
 * b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * A few remarks, if they are fixed it may pass. TheWombatGuru (talk) 21:05, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you for taking time to review this article. I have responded to the issues above. -- BloonsTDFan360  (Park and Ride) 23:39, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
 * All issues seem to be resolved. Article has passed. TheWombatGuru (talk) 23:48, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
 * b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * A few remarks, if they are fixed it may pass. TheWombatGuru (talk) 21:05, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you for taking time to review this article. I have responded to the issues above. -- BloonsTDFan360  (Park and Ride) 23:39, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
 * All issues seem to be resolved. Article has passed. TheWombatGuru (talk) 23:48, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you for taking time to review this article. I have responded to the issues above. -- BloonsTDFan360  (Park and Ride) 23:39, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
 * All issues seem to be resolved. Article has passed. TheWombatGuru (talk) 23:48, 22 December 2014 (UTC)