Talk:Oregon State Hospital/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:42, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I am taking a look and making some straightforward copyedits as I go. I'll jot questions/issues below:


 *  The hospital has been featured in popular culture, used as.... - not a fan of this, I'd just let the facts speak for themselves


 * ' 'Oregon State Hospital is located in what is referred to as the Oregon State Hospital Historic District'' - why do we need the qualifying " what is referred to as"?


 * At the first mention of James C. Hawthorne I'd add a descriptor (e.g. "American physician" or whatever)


 *  Activist Dorothea Dix was an advocate of Hawthorne's original hospital, which she had visited twice, and was a vocal critic of the opening of the new state hospital, - if she supported the first but opposed the second...shouldn't it be a "but" not "and" joining the two clauses. Also, why did she support the first and can we add anything on her views on the second? Controversy is important here.


 *  Before the introduction of psychoactive drugs in the late-twentieth century,... - is that what the source says? chlorpromazine was introduced in 1952 and its use spread quickly...


 *  Moises Perez, a paranoid schizophrenic  - you'd not say this, but rather "the patient Moises Perez, who had schizophrenia " i.e. use noun for condition not adjective


 *  ...and treatment for a patient, Moises Perez, age 42, who died there in October 2009 - you don't need to mention his date of death again


 * Population and administration section should be in chronological order

Err...? You see this? Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:19, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * apologies—this got lost in my notification feed. I will review your comments this evening and make the appropriate edits. Was this the whole of the review? Thank you --Drown Soda (talk) 21:19, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Dunno yet - I need to read it again I think, to see what else I might have missed. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:32, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I have addressed your above comments, and also added updated information about the facility's new superintendent as of Feb. 2018. Let me know if there are other concerns. --Drown Soda (talk) 00:55, 22 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Can you address the tag.


 * How many beds does it have now? I can't see it in the text...have I missed it?


 * Any other details on what it does now? e.g. still doing ECT I presume? And long-stay as well as short-stay wards?


 * I think I have addressed the above issues; I added a citation for the railroad information; as far as the current bed number, it is sourced at 620 (post-renovation in 2010; see ref. 53). As far as the use of electroconvulsive therapy, it was still practiced at the hospital per a 1988 report, but I cannot find a source that patently states whether or not it's used today. I presume it is as ECT is still used in some situations, but I can't say for sure. --Drown Soda (talk) 00:37, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

1. Well written?:
 * Prose quality:
 * Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
 * References to sources:
 * Citations to reliable sources, where required: - one bit to fix
 * No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:
 * Major aspects: - just checking the current bed issue ok I give up, the website is opaque and there is nothing else about.
 * Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
 * Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?
 * No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
 * Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: - three minor issues, otherwise lookin' Good....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:05, 22 February 2018 (UTC)