Talk:Oregon v. Guzek

Comments
I wikified it as best as I could. However, I am not a lawyer and Wikipedia does not have very many legal definitions for linking. For example, mitigation lead to a huge article on Environmental Mitigation, as if that is the entire meaning of mitigation. (Same problem with the word "evole" by the way: all roads lead to Evolution).

Anyway, I think a legal person should look at this and make sure terms are used correctly etc. KarenAnn 22:43, 6 June 2006 (UTC)


 * I've redirected many of the links to the articles on legal topics. In the case of mitigation, this redirected to environmental mitigation, which has a link at the top directing one to the correct legal article on extenuating circumstances.  The same is also true of evolution, btw; note the link to evolution (disambiguation) at the top.
 * When generally writing an article, excessive wikilinking is discouraged. Only terms that are central to the article should be linked to (or for which a further explanation would help understanding of this article), and should only be linked no more than once per article section.  Postdlf 23:45, 6 June 2006 (UTC)


 * BTW, there's a wikilink style guide on these issues: Only make links that are relevant to the context. Postdlf 00:07, 7 June 2006 (UTC)