Talk:Oreo O's

(Comment)
Mmm...excessive sugar. --Scaryice 11:55, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

Original Shape
I believe that the cereal was originally shaped like miniature stuffed Oreo cookies, with extra brown sauce. Am I correct?
 * Nope. 208.45.229.3 20:46, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

I used to eat this stuff day and night when I was a kid. I'm suddenly craving some. :)

I cannot believe they have been discontinued, why would they do something so stupid. They were so yummy and popular so why would you discontinue them?!?!?!?!?! Doesnt make sense! >:-/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.198.2.172 (talk) 06:18, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Discontinued
I strongly believe this cereal was discontinued. I haven't seen it since about 2001 or 2002. -24.92.41.95 18:05, 19 October 2006 (UTC) I agree!!!! It was my FAVORITE! buttholes! why cant they just be friends? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.97.210.128 (talk) 02:20, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
 * No, it's still around. I bought a box some time during 2006. --138.89.127.52 03:28, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

What store did you buy it from?

I've seen this cereal at Walgreens around 2006. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.126.160.90 (talk) 04:23, August 30, 2007 (UTC)

No luck at Walgreen's. Any other ideas? We used to get it at Walmart but they do not have it anymore. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.234.229.133 (talk) 00:28, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

I've been looking for quit some time. 've been looking all over for it but have had no luck. my friend said she saw some at some wal-mart recently —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.126.119.194 (talk) 19:19, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Oreo O's.gif
Image:Oreo O's.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging
This article talk page was automatically added with WikiProject Food and drink banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here. If you have concerns, please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 14:17, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

And it seems to me you lived your life Like a candle in the wind —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.90.141.25 (talk) 23:15, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi
This article was full of unnecessary information and bad writing. I trimmed it down and polished it into the stub it should be. Seriously, it was an embarrassment to read that article, it was like a 14 year old wrote it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.194.88.241 (talk) 02:58, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Disputed
This article is dreadful. The only citation is to a blog, and most of the 'facts' are dubious at best. Matt J User&#124;Talk 23:12, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I dont see how it can be saved. There just isnt sourcing available.  Even a "book" available from Amazon that mentions the subject is simply a compendium of Wikipedia articles.  This is original research at best and just plain made up at worst.  Prod'd it this morning.  Since it's linked from reddit.com now, I suspect someone will remove the prod seeing it as a way to support their favorite cereal, but let's see if Wikipedia procedure can move along anyway.--RadioFan (talk) 12:20, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

For what it's worth, it doesn't seem mathematically possible for the cereal to have 21.52g of carbohydrates, 9.95g of fat, and 12.8g of protein in a 27g serving, seeing as how carbohydrates, fat, and protein are mutually exclusive. Perhaps the nutritional information should be dropped if the real numbers can't be verified? 108.67.22.244 (talk) 04:36, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
 * If the nutrition label lists impossible numbers, is that notable? 71.121.143.214 (talk) 04:10, 4 June 2019 (UTC)