Talk:Organization of Yugoslav Nationalists

WP:COMMON NAME: Orjuna is more common search result
27,500 Google search results for: Orjuna -wikipedia 811 Google search results for: "organization of yugoslav nationalists" -wikipedia

Also the movement called itself by short form as Orjuna, so there is no problem at all with using the short-form term.

By WP:COMMONNAME I am moving it to "Orjuna".--R-41 (talk) 02:37, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

That was
organization for keeping of integral Yugoslav state and madeing of integral yugoslav nation, so naturaly it had a problem with all antistate and antinational elements in the country, as ethnic separatists (Serb, croat and Slovene), separatistic movements by the ethnic minorities, and also comunists which openly had antistate policy. That's it. If that was fascism then you should think as people from that historical period, not by opinion from 21th century, cause Fascist movement and ideology as italian product had thesis that parts of Yugoslavia should became integral parts of great Italy...So who were the "fascists" in that story, someone who defend it's own country ? Strange opinion...Also antisemitism was never part of its ideology, cause they were not clerical or proreligious group, they were nationalistic movement, and every single person which were against integral state of Yugoslavia was their's enemy. In this text, there is obviously some melting pott of different ideologies, movements, eticeta's..which is totaly out of question.--Rethymno (talk) 13:17, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
 * First of all... "Serb separatists"? Can you name even one Serbian organisation that existed in that period and was against Yugoslavia? Thank you. FkpCascais (talk) 14:43, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Probably posibility of some individuals, not organizations. That's truth, Serbs were mostley satisfied with state in which they lived, even noone asked them. Anyway Orjuna wasnt "fascists" and antisemitic group, which is most important and which this text want to present. This text is probably writing from the opinion of procroatian antiyugoslav position and then naturaly that should be absolutely negative presented for the public in modern days Croatia. So, as always text like this had a position of modern times after desolution of Yugoslavia, so its not neutral and it cant explaine position of that time situation in Dalmacia f.e....--Rethymno (talk) 12:42, 9 August 2018 (UTC)