Talk:Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Arguments

Change from redirect to disambiguation, or perhaps a standalone article
Currently redirects to the Freeman OPCA, but there are a number of OPCAs: The OPCA term was coined by Rooke ACJ in Meads v Meads, 2012 ABQB 571, 543 AR 215 to describe a collection of pseudolegal concepts advanced on a commercial basis by scammers and conmen, “OPCA gurus”, who promote allegedly legal procedures that supposedly:
 * 1) bend courts into submission,
 * 2) nullify state authority, or
 * 3) provide free money.

All are false. Many are contempt of court: Fearn v Canada Customs, 2014 ABQB 114, 586 AR 23, per Tilleman J, (though in a criminal context). None provide any benefit, except to those who sell these concepts for profit. - Jack N. Stock (talk) 12:50, 20 June 2017 (UTC)