Talk:Oriflame

Bias
Parts of this article read like something of a puff piece, especially the unverified claims about partnerships with laboratories etc. Feels like the article was written by a representative of the company. 82.32.168.104 (talk) 15:40, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Regrettably, marketing drivel is common in Wikipedia articles about barely-notable companies, since it is rare that there are any high-quality independent sources available, and few editors without a conflict of interest are motivated to write about them. I have trimmed some of the worst content out of the article.  If you have any good sources about Oriflame please do use them to add some neutral, informative content to the article, and feel free to remove unsourced or poorly-sourced promotional content yourself wherever you see it on Wikipedia. Wham2001 (talk) 15:55, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Spam?
Is everyone ok with me removing the apparent spam from this talk page...? Jmbld (talk) 03:20, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Removed.Jmbld (talk) 02:58, 30 November 2022 (UTC)