Talk:Original Sin (2001 film)

Sex scene real?
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Original_Sin_%28film%29&diff=118037588&oldid=111347312 is the only contribution of User:Handsome lad, so it seems that this is just a fake entry. IMHO it better should be removed until a source is available. --NeoUrfahraner 12:29, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * If it was his only edit it is worth considering that it could be a fake entry. However, having seen the movie, it is not at all a stretch of the imagination to believe that many people consider the sex scene to be real (I myself have no idea and wouln't be surprised if it was true). But I'm not exactly sure how you would cite this, however. -Kraw Night 13:36, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * IMHO it would suffice to cite some yellow press article that makes such a statement - this would not prove that the sex scene was real, but it would at least prove that some people believe that it was real. --NeoUrfahraner 08:33, 25 May 2007 (UTC)


 * If only DVD movies supported camera angle control like they said they would. ...WHY is this important? A gx7 13:39, 24 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I do not think that the sentence "Many believe that the sex scene was real due to the intensity of the physical connection between Banderas and Jolie." is important. Should we remove it? --NeoUrfahraner 14:31, 24 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I now removed the suspect (and not really important) sentence. If someone finds some source supporting it, one may add it again. --NeoUrfahraner 10:50, 25 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I watched this movie, a while ago. In the DVD Commentary, the director mentions that for one of the scenes, both Angelina and Antonio elected to do the scene entirely nude (rather than wear flesh-colored patches, for example).  No mention was made of actual coitus.  Maxvip (talk) 00:51, 18 August 2009 (UTC)


 * So what if they did? I agree, if citation can be found, or if Antonio and Angelina edit their own Wikipedia articles, then we'd know. Coffee5binky (talk) 15:50, 7 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Regarding this film as a whole, there is also an "Unrated" version on DVD, which possibly restores the scene in its entirety before the cuts were made. Plus, the "Unrated" version runs two minutes longer than the "Rated" version (118 Minutes and 116 Minutes). Could it be that maybe that was what the person meant when they added that sentence? Just something that came to my mind, so I thought I would express my thoughts here in this regard.Frschoonover (talk) 16:26, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Advert?
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Original_Sin_%28film%29&diff=139395276&oldid=138592118 : Actually I do not agree that this section is written like an advertisement. Any different opinions? --NeoUrfahraner 10:34, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

For crying out loud
"It doesn't take long for Julia and Luis to end up in bed and having wild orgasmic sex in which Julia screams"

Not exactly encyclopedic tone. A gx7 01:18, 24 June 2007 (UTC)


 * What would you prefer? Remove "in which Julia screams"? --NeoUrfahraner 14:16, 26 June 2007 (UTC)


 * The grammar is wrong and I don't really think the intensity of the character's orgasm is relevant to the plot. Or maybe it is, I haven't seen the movie. But at least make the sentence more formal. I can't do it because I've stopped editting; I just thought I'd answer your question. A gx7 01:14, 2 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The complete sentence is not really relevant. I removed it. --NeoUrfahraner 07:01, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Original Sin movie poster.jpg
Image:Original Sin movie poster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC)