Talk:Orion Nebula/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

This review is part of WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force/Sweeps, a project devoted to re-reviewing Good Articles listed before August 26, 2007. -- ErgoSum • talk • trib  22:11, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

The first issue I see is the introduction is too short (MOS:INTRO). Although it might not be a big enough issue to disqualify it for GA status. Reference link #10 is dead, there is an archive version available, but it simply links to an abstract. I assume this article was in the print version of Sky and Telescope? If so, a link is not absolutely required, although an ISBN or some other identifier should prove useful. These are just superficial issues I see so far, I haven't given the article a full read yet. -- ErgoSum • talk • trib  22:39, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Thanks for the review.&mdash;RJH (talk) 23:36, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Thanks for the review.&mdash;RJH (talk) 23:36, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Thanks for the review.&mdash;RJH (talk) 23:36, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review.&mdash;RJH (talk) 23:36, 4 January 2010 (UTC)